Regardless of how you feel about genetically modified crops, the Supreme Court will hear one case that could affect many future cases across many different industries. This case involved a farmer who paid Monsanto to use his seed for a while, but of course, the seed grew into a plant that produced more seed, and then the farmer used the seed from that plant without paying Monsanto extra to produce it. continue to use.
Monsanto has spent billions of dollars developing specialty seeds and needs to amortize the investment and secure patents for these genetically modified seeds. Let's talk, shall we? If you want to file a lawsuit, then you can also hire roundup cancer attorney in Dallas
On February 20, 2013, the Wall Street Journal had an interesting Op-Ed titled; The "Seed of Innovation" aptly implies that a Supreme Court hearing Monsanto's case will have "consequences far beyond agriculture for biotechnology and any company that is heavily reliant on patents". And I totally agree with that.
Now the question involves a self-replicating scenario where these seeds continually make new seeds, right? In many cases the organic seed is linked to an electronic "zip file" that 3D printers will use in the future. This means that someone sending someone a 3D zip file can grab it, load it onto their printer, and print the object. These can be printed over and over again, even if the individual user only pays to print this file. Refuse once